Some of them even leave college to pursue professional athletic dreams before they have finished their degrees. They do not see the point of continuing with a degree when they are able to receive hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars per year by playing their sport professionally. If they were paid, would they stay in college instead? Is that a reason to offer them money when they are still in college, or would that further hamper them from actually getting an education?
The arguments are heated, and important. Discussed here will be the arguments both for and against paying college athletes for their playing and their abilities. The reasons behind each argument will be addressed, in order to understand what most people find acceptable and why some people think that these athletes should be paid while others feel it is a poor choice.
The difficulty with this issue is that there are no studies providing empirical evidence about college athletics in the sense that they have been paid in the past. College athletes have never been paid in the way that professional athletes have, so determining whether paying them is good or bad is mostly conjecture and opinion. This is important to note, but it does not negate the validity of the arguments regarding this very important issue. The Argument for Paying Athletes According to those who believe that college athletes should be paid, they deserve to get a percentage of what they are providing to the school and the coaches.
In other words, the coaches who work with college athletes receive large checks. They also get perks and bonuses that they enjoy - especially when their team has a winning season. Because of that, they bring in a lot of money for themselves and the university where they teach Nocera, Additionally, the merchandise and marketing of the team brings in billions of dollars per year across all colleges that have sports teams.
This money is a huge financial boon for the colleges and universities, but what about the players? What do they receive. Beyond a college education, they are not given anything. They see copies of their jerseys for sale in the campus bookstore, and they see thousands of fans screaming and cheering from the stands, but they do not see anything in their bank account - while the school and its coaches get rich off of what the players have to offer Nocera, Many would not consider that fair.
In the past, some schools have experimented with paying their players a stipend for the work that they do on the field or the court. Of course, those who signed up when the amount was in force will most likely still receive it, but that does not mean that others will be able to get it - even though it was previously offered to some.
Paying athletes is important, the school argued, not because of the money they make for the school but because they work so hard and they often do not get a completely free ride in the sense that all of their tuition and other fees are covered.
Still, many colleges and athletes and the parents of those athletes believe that college athletics is less of a sport and more of a money-making endeavor for the college Eassom, ; Hill, While the students are, technically, there to get a college education, the argument is that they are given a high level of breaks and are provided with easy classes so that they can stay eligible to play their sport.
For them, the college experience is not about learning and their resume is their actual playing ability. They are being watched and monitored when they play, and those who do exceptionally well are often "drafted" right out of their college careers and into professional sports, where they will be paid handsomely. For those athletes who do not make it that far, though, the issue is more about how hard they work while they are in college and how much benefit they provide to their school.
Being paid for that is important, just like being paid for any other job. The Argument for Not Paying Athletes The history of college athletics does not allow for them to be paid, and why should history be changed at this point? Many athletes want to be paid while they play their way through college Hill, ; Nocera, Their families also often think that they should be paid, because they work very hard and they bring in a lot of revenue for the school.
However, there are two solid arguments as to why these athletes should not be paid for what they do. Order A Custom Written Essay. Accessed 25 November Accessed 3 November The debate of whether college athletes should obtain payment for their services needs to rest by extensive solution. The perfect way to solve the issue at hand involves additional payment for the services of the college athletes. This would supplement the scholarships and accommodation fees university and college athletes enjoy currently.
There are several reasons why. However, the United States is not a socialist society. Individuals get paid for the work they do and some jobs simply pay more than others. A lawyer is always going to make more than a manager at McDonalds even though both likely work equally as hard for their families.
Working hard does not always equal increased pay. College football and basketball are simply the most revenue-generating sports sponsored by the.
Paying them to play sports in college would devalue their education and encourage them to continue on a path that will never be profitable in the long-term Hill, Conclusion As can be seen, there are two sides to the story.
Research Paper On Paying College Athletes College Athletes Should be Paid Jean M Denis 11/03/14 Enc Freshmen Comp I I. Background and Thesis There has been major discussion recently concerning the topic if college athletes should or shouldn't be paid while they are attending school The first thing the opposition wants to say is, "They're already getting a scholarship!
- Today there are over , college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that .
The college athletes of their respective sports today, have the opportunity of showcasing their talents in competition on local and national programming on a regular basis which has lately brought attention this controversy, paying college athletes. Student athletes are not professional athletes they are students who attend college to receive an education and participate in sports that they have a scholarship for. Collegiate sports are not a career or profession it is a way for students to earn a higher education degree.
View this research paper on Should College Athletes Be Paid. Athletics at college level comprise of an array of competitive sports and games that are largely. Paying College Athletes One of the biggest issues in college athletics that has been put to question for a number of years is whether or not college athletes should be paid for .